 |
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, Apr 25 2014 (IPS) - The tiny Pacific nation state of Marshall Islands - which depends heavily on the United States for its economic survival, uses the U.S. dollar as its currency and predictably votes with Washington on all controversial political issues at the United Nations - is challenging the world´s nuclear powers before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday, is being described as a potential battle between a puny David and a mighty Goliath: a country with a population of a little over 68,000 people defying the world´s nine nuclear powers with over 3.5 billion people.
"The United States should defend the case and widen the opportunity for the Court to resolve the wide divide of opinion regarding the state of compliance with the disarmament obligations." -- John Burroughs
John Burroughs, executive director of the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy and the U.N. Office of the International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA), told IPS the Marshall Islands and its legal team strongly encourage other states to support the case, by making statements, and by filing their own parallel cases if they qualify, or by intervening in the case.
Burroughs, who is a member of that team, said the ICJ, in its 1996 advisory opinion, held unanimously that there exists an obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations on nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control.
And these cases brought by the Marshall Islands nearly 18 years after the ICJ advisory opinion "will put to the test the claims of the nine states possessing nuclear arsenals that they are in compliance with international law regarding nuclear disarmament and cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date."
The nine nuclear states include the five permanent members (P5) of the U.N. Security Council, namely the United States, the UK, France, China and Russia, plus India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea.
Burroughs said three of the respondent states - the UK, India, and Pakistan - have accepted the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court, as has the Marshall Islands....
After 18 years I am happy to see this issue gets its follow up. Oh yes, I was present in November 1995 - Oral Hearings - and the 8 July 1996 - the release date of the Advisory Opinion - at the ICJ and gave the team all my support on both occasions. I wish the team all the best !
Ak Malten, Pro Peaceful Energy Use
U.S.-Dependent Pacific Island Defies Nuke Powers
Related:
U.S. examining Marshall Islands' nuclear lawsuits, defends record
| |
No comments:
Post a Comment